Difference between revisions of "CITCONAsiaPacific2008Sessions"
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search(10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#[[Managing data with regression integration testing.]] | #[[Managing data with regression integration testing.]] | ||
#[[Acceptance TDD]] | #[[Acceptance TDD]] | ||
+ | #[[Continuous Integration for 'Different' Builds]] | ||
== 2:00 Topics == | == 2:00 Topics == | ||
#[[Different Styles of TDD]] | #[[Different Styles of TDD]] | ||
− | #[[ | + | #[[Show us your Build!]] |
+ | #[[Does high Code Coverage mean high test quality?]] | ||
+ | #[[Visualisation of Quality]] | ||
== 3:15 Topics == | == 3:15 Topics == | ||
#[[The People Side of CI]] | #[[The People Side of CI]] | ||
− | #[[ | + | #[[Performance Testing]] |
+ | #[[Does high Code Coverage mean high test quality?]] | ||
== 4:30 Topics == | == 4:30 Topics == | ||
#[[Tracking Code Quality]] | #[[Tracking Code Quality]] | ||
+ | #[[CITCON ANZ 2009]] | ||
+ | #[[Using Groovy in Testing]] | ||
#[[Topic]] | #[[Topic]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:05, 6 July 2008
CITCON 2008 Melbourne Session
10:00 Topics
11:15 Topics
- Managing data with regression integration testing.
- Acceptance TDD
- Continuous Integration for 'Different' Builds
2:00 Topics
- Different Styles of TDD
- Show us your Build!
- Does high Code Coverage mean high test quality?
- Visualisation of Quality