Difference between revisions of "How do you make CI more fun"
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLevibalint (talk | contribs) |
Levibalint (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==From gold stars to karma points == | ==From gold stars to karma points == | ||
==The Simpsons did it!== | ==The Simpsons did it!== | ||
| + | * http://codeclimber.net.nz/archive/2007/03/27/Continuous-Integration-with-The-Simpsonstrade.aspx | ||
==Habitica== | ==Habitica== | ||
* https://habitica.com | * https://habitica.com | ||
Latest revision as of 07:29, 26 April 2016
Introduction
One of the major areas we explored is how to make the feedback part of the CI more engaging. We discussed several options:
- Extreme Feedback
- Gamification - is it good or bad?
- Do we really need CI in the first place?
Given the last point of our discussion, the focus shifted to alternatives to CI and how to keep up the quality of the code while still having fun :D.
Extreme Feedback
Slack bots can be super!
Ambient orbs can be awesome!
- http://www.ambientdevices.com
- http://blog.last.fm/2008/08/01/quality-control
- https://github.com/luismreis/beacon
Lava lamps can be legendary!
- http://www.developertesting.com/archives/month200404/20040401-eXtremeFeedbackForSoftwareDevelopment.html
- https://github.com/luismreis/beacon
