Difference between revisions of "CITConNA2007Feedback"

From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Matthew Stevenson comments)
m (Reverted edits by Upinson (talk) to last revision by Mandersn)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
[[Refactoring And Legacy Systems]] -- [[Curtis Barnes]]
 
[[Refactoring And Legacy Systems]] -- [[Curtis Barnes]]
  
[[What Is The One True LanguageFor Writing Tests]] -- [[Jason Huggins]], [[Elisabeth Hendrickson]], [[Kevin Miller]]
+
[[What Is The One True LanguageFor Writing Tests]] -- [[Jason Huggins]], [[Elisabeth Hendrickson]], [[Kevin Miller]], [[Derek del Carpio]], [[Toby Tripp]]
  
 
Are the categories of Unit test, Integration test, Acceptance test, etc., still useful? -- [[Richard Jensen]]
 
Are the categories of Unit test, Integration test, Acceptance test, etc., still useful? -- [[Richard Jensen]]
  
[[IsRSpecAwesomeOrWhat | Is RSpec Awesome or What?]] -- [[Jason Darling]], [[John Woodward]]
+
[[IsRSpecAwesomeOrWhat | Is RSpec Awesome or What?]] -- [[Jason Darling]], [[John Woodward]], [[Ram Singaram]]
  
 
[[What Is After 100 Pct Coverage And Functional Tests]] -- [[David O'Hara]]
 
[[What Is After 100 Pct Coverage And Functional Tests]] -- [[David O'Hara]]
  
[[Code Metrics]] -- [[Paul Holser]], [[Eric Pugh]]
+
[[Code Metrics]] -- [[Paul Holser]], [[Eric Pugh]], [[Vandana Shah]], [[Harlan Wood]]
  
 
Any of them -- [[William Zachary]]
 
Any of them -- [[William Zachary]]
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 
Discussion in the tavern -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 
Discussion in the tavern -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 +
 +
All -- [[Andy Glover]]
 +
 +
CI Practices - Barriers to Implementation -- [[David Kermis]]
 +
 +
[[Next Gen Test Automation Tools What Is Next]] -- [[Mark Anderson]]
 +
 +
[[Where are you in the CI adoption life cycle?]] -- [[Lydia Tripp]], [[Bill Ott]]
  
 
== What I liked '''most''' was: ==
 
== What I liked '''most''' was: ==
Line 67: Line 75:
  
 
Open flow of information and ideas -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 
Open flow of information and ideas -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 +
 +
Meeting folks with interesting problems + tools. -- [[Eric Minick]]
 +
 +
Nice people, collection of people in same boat -- [[Derek del Carpio]]
 +
 +
Open space format of conference -- [[Vandana Shah]]
 +
 +
Format of conference -- [[David Kermis]]
 +
 +
Informal interactions - Happy Hour(s), breakfast, lunch -- [[Mark Anderson]]
 +
 +
The energy -- [[Lydia Tripp]]
 +
 +
Awesome knowledge sharing -- [[Harlan Wood]]
 +
 +
Language for testing discussions -- [[Bill Ott]]
 +
 +
Breakout conversations -- [[Ram Singaram]]
 +
 +
Ability to ask questions and direct discussions -- [[Nick Naumovich]]
 +
 +
Big visible charts -- [[Toby Tripp]]
  
 
== What I liked '''least''' was: ==
 
== What I liked '''least''' was: ==
Line 91: Line 121:
  
 
Nothing -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 
Nothing -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 +
 +
The session mix didn't excite as much as possible -- [[Eric Minick]]
 +
 +
Sessions where the instigator didn't attend -- [[Mark Anderson]]
 +
 +
It is exhausting -- [[Lydia Tripp]]
 +
 +
Silly infighting at one session -- [[Harlan Wood]]
 +
 +
No agenda in session to drive discussion -- [[Bill Ott]]
 +
 +
Length vs breadth (can't be in 2 places at once) -- [[Nick Naumovich]]
 +
 +
Narrow hallway of agenda -- [[Toby Tripp]]
  
 
== For next time, I suggest: ==
 
== For next time, I suggest: ==
Line 113: Line 157:
  
 
Have an area on the wiki, a place where individuals can add their specialties or areas of expertise. -- [[Cruz Pitre]]
 
Have an area on the wiki, a place where individuals can add their specialties or areas of expertise. -- [[Cruz Pitre]]
 +
 +
More non-vendors in the mix. -- [[Eric Minick]]
 +
 +
Instead of 5 sessions by 5 tracks, have 6 sessions by 4 tracks. People can learn more & lessen conflict of interest when multiple happening at same time. -- [[Derek del Carpio]]
 +
 +
Longer conference for more sessions. -- [[David Kermis]]
 +
 +
Sessions with more preparation by instigator were better. More organization of scheduling (<sigh> I'm too compulsive about organization) -- [[Mark Anderson]]
 +
 +
NYC -- [[Harlan Wood]]
 +
 +
Lightning talks -- [[Bret Pettichord]]
 +
 +
Introductions are very long -- [[Bill Ott]]
 +
 +
Nothing -- it's just a fact -- [[Nick Naumovich]]
  
 
== Additional comments: ==
 
== Additional comments: ==
Line 120: Line 180:
 
Great conference. -- [[Jason Darling]]
 
Great conference. -- [[Jason Darling]]
  
Loved it!! Stayed longer than I originally though I would. Glad to finally meet Jtf & PJ and others. -- [[John Woodward]]
+
Loved it!! Stayed longer than I originally thought I would. Glad to finally meet Jtf & PJ and others. -- [[John Woodward]]
  
 
Woo! -- [[Gary McCants]]
 
Woo! -- [[Gary McCants]]
  
 
Coming to this conference I was somewhat skeptical about the open spaces and the schedule, because of that I had no goal in mind coming here. After the sessions, I am sold on the format and only wish it went on longer. -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 
Coming to this conference I was somewhat skeptical about the open spaces and the schedule, because of that I had no goal in mind coming here. After the sessions, I am sold on the format and only wish it went on longer. -- [[Matthew Stevenson]]
 +
 +
See you next year!! -- [[Andy Glover]]
 +
 +
I'd do another in Texas without question, further away becomes more difficult -- [[Mark Anderson]]
 +
 +
Thanks for having us (Toby & I) again, we truly enjoyed ourselves -- [[Lydia Tripp]]
 +
 +
Great work! Thanks to the sponsors -- [[Harlan Wood]]
 +
 +
Loved the format! -- [[Nick Naumovich]]

Latest revision as of 04:29, 10 September 2012

Multiple choice questions on feedback form where possible responses were Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree or No Answer.

Question : Median Response

My goal was served by attending this conference : Strongly Agree

I enjoyed attending CITCON North America 2007 : Strongly Agree

The OpenSpace format is appropriate for me : Strongly Agree

I used the "Law of Two Feet" during the conference : Agree

The location of the conference was convenient : Agree

I would come back if there is another conference next year : Strongly Agree


The session I liked most was:

Refactoring And Legacy Systems -- Curtis Barnes

What Is The One True LanguageFor Writing Tests -- Jason Huggins, Elisabeth Hendrickson, Kevin Miller, Derek del Carpio, Toby Tripp

Are the categories of Unit test, Integration test, Acceptance test, etc., still useful? -- Richard Jensen

Is RSpec Awesome or What? -- Jason Darling, John Woodward, Ram Singaram

What Is After 100 Pct Coverage And Functional Tests -- David O'Hara

Code Metrics -- Paul Holser, Eric Pugh, Vandana Shah, Harlan Wood

Any of them -- William Zachary

All that attended -- Cruz Pitre

Discussion in the tavern -- Matthew Stevenson

All -- Andy Glover

CI Practices - Barriers to Implementation -- David Kermis

Next Gen Test Automation Tools What Is Next -- Mark Anderson

Where are you in the CI adoption life cycle? -- Lydia Tripp, Bill Ott

What I liked most was:

Conversations with lots of people with different perspectives. -- David Gauthier

Meeting others with similar struggles -- Curtis Barnes

Talking! :) -- Jason Huggins

Hallway and bar conversations. -- Chris Turner

Discussions. -- Elisabeth Hendrickson

Interaction with others. -- Richard Jensen

Meeting everyone and talking tech. -- Maciej Zawadzki

Open space format & such amazingly bright folks. -- David O'Hara

Hearing other people's experiences. -- Michael Rousey

Open format made for very relevant topics, and allowed for going off-topic if the participants wanted to. -- John Woodward

The opportunity to network with passionate software professionals and learn tons. -- Paul Holser

The format & energy. -- Gary McCants

Everything -- William Zachary

Learning about Open Spaces, meeting people. -- Eric Pugh

Open flow of information and ideas -- Matthew Stevenson

Meeting folks with interesting problems + tools. -- Eric Minick

Nice people, collection of people in same boat -- Derek del Carpio

Open space format of conference -- Vandana Shah

Format of conference -- David Kermis

Informal interactions - Happy Hour(s), breakfast, lunch -- Mark Anderson

The energy -- Lydia Tripp

Awesome knowledge sharing -- Harlan Wood

Language for testing discussions -- Bill Ott

Breakout conversations -- Ram Singaram

Ability to ask questions and direct discussions -- Nick Naumovich

Big visible charts -- Toby Tripp

What I liked least was:

Some people liked to hear themselves talk too much, some conversations were too theoretical. -- David Gauthier

Too many good talks happening at the same time (hard to choose between them). -- Jason Huggins

Venue. -- Elisabeth Hendrickson

Choosing which popular session I was going to attend. :-) -- Richard Jensen

Who Is Responsible To Implement And Manage CI? by me, because no one came. :) -- Jason Darling

Too short. Not enough time to be involved in everything. -- David O'Hara

I could not attend all the sessions. -- Michael Rousey

Long drive from my house (40 minutes), but there's not much that could have been done about that! -- John Woodward

Some folks too argumentative and sanctimonious. :) -- Gary McCants

Fishbowl concept; people shouldn't have to leave. -- William Zachary

Nothing -- Matthew Stevenson

The session mix didn't excite as much as possible -- Eric Minick

Sessions where the instigator didn't attend -- Mark Anderson

It is exhausting -- Lydia Tripp

Silly infighting at one session -- Harlan Wood

No agenda in session to drive discussion -- Bill Ott

Length vs breadth (can't be in 2 places at once) -- Nick Naumovich

Narrow hallway of agenda -- Toby Tripp

For next time, I suggest:

Division between theory-session and practical. -- David Gauthier

One large group speaker (on Friday night?). -- Curtis Barnes

More hot water for tea. -- Elisabeth Hendrickson

Same format. Having people put up a bio that talks about their skill sets so people could talk to people who had experience with certain tools/apps. -- Jason Darling

More attendees. Too many vendors and organizers. These people should be here but not counted in the attendance limit. -- Maciej Zawadzki

You have it here in Dallas again. -- David O'Hara

Same level of lunch, drinks. will suggest to my company to help sponsor. -- John Woodward

Two days of sessions? -- Paul Holser

Archiving of all sessions. -- William Zachary

Have an area on the wiki, a place where individuals can add their specialties or areas of expertise. -- Cruz Pitre

More non-vendors in the mix. -- Eric Minick

Instead of 5 sessions by 5 tracks, have 6 sessions by 4 tracks. People can learn more & lessen conflict of interest when multiple happening at same time. -- Derek del Carpio

Longer conference for more sessions. -- David Kermis

Sessions with more preparation by instigator were better. More organization of scheduling (<sigh> I'm too compulsive about organization) -- Mark Anderson

NYC -- Harlan Wood

Lightning talks -- Bret Pettichord

Introductions are very long -- Bill Ott

Nothing -- it's just a fact -- Nick Naumovich

Additional comments:

Thank you for creating CITCON! -- Jason Huggins

Great conference. -- Jason Darling

Loved it!! Stayed longer than I originally thought I would. Glad to finally meet Jtf & PJ and others. -- John Woodward

Woo! -- Gary McCants

Coming to this conference I was somewhat skeptical about the open spaces and the schedule, because of that I had no goal in mind coming here. After the sessions, I am sold on the format and only wish it went on longer. -- Matthew Stevenson

See you next year!! -- Andy Glover

I'd do another in Texas without question, further away becomes more difficult -- Mark Anderson

Thanks for having us (Toby & I) again, we truly enjoyed ourselves -- Lydia Tripp

Great work! Thanks to the sponsors -- Harlan Wood

Loved the format! -- Nick Naumovich