ADRs, Guardrails and Golden Paths
From CitconWikiJump to navigationJump to search
Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)
- Documenting Architecture Decisions by Michael Nygard
- Scaling the Practice of Architecture, Conversationally
- There's also a great ADR template in there.
- ADRs need to be documented at the time the decision is made
- Include the reasoning behind why the decision was made at the time
- A lot of recommendations are to author in markdown and check in to version control
- I think it should live in the repo for which the decision applies
- I have seen many cases of making general blanket architecture decisions (or suggestions) and labeling them as ADRs
- Encourage people to author ADRs as an opportunity towards career growth
- They could certainly act as an aid when outsourcing a project especially when there is the possibility of the code and maintenance coming back to you at some point.
- Another type of documentation I've been promoting are "guardrails" which are constraints that are put in place by some central team (e.g. CTO, Security team, etc).
- These are not ADRs in that they are general constraints that all architectures of the org are expected to be adhered to.
- The 3rd type of document I've been promoting is a Golden Path or well-documented, potentially with tooling support, but repeatable path for a specific implementation.
- Golden Paths at Spotify
- Aside: there is a system available from Spotify for managing a related developer portal for golden paths: Backstage
- AKA Paved Roads at Netflix