Difference between revisions of "Teaching Next Gen of SW Eng."
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (A page for outputs from our session) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* from low abstraction (hardware, assembly language etc) to high abstraction (process, systems thinking, thinking about learning, etc) | * from low abstraction (hardware, assembly language etc) to high abstraction (process, systems thinking, thinking about learning, etc) | ||
* from core (for everyone) to nice (interesting and useful, but not for everyone) | * from core (for everyone) to nice (interesting and useful, but not for everyone) | ||
| + | |||
| + | A picture of the whiteboard featuring everyone's suggestions is linked here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wc4YKp1W0W4lz77xkZm_Mgwbk11IRCgy/view?usp=sharing | ||
Latest revision as of 02:50, 28 September 2025
We ran a session looking at topics that we thought should fit in to a computer science / software engineering degree, particularly looking at timeless topics, and those that would provide foundations for future generations of engineers.
We plotted the suggested topics on a 2-axis chart
- from low abstraction (hardware, assembly language etc) to high abstraction (process, systems thinking, thinking about learning, etc)
- from core (for everyone) to nice (interesting and useful, but not for everyone)
A picture of the whiteboard featuring everyone's suggestions is linked here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wc4YKp1W0W4lz77xkZm_Mgwbk11IRCgy/view?usp=sharing
