Difference between revisions of "Is SCRUM Evil?"
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchJuliangamble (talk | contribs) |
Juliangamble (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
- it has certification | - it has certification | ||
- it is the philosopher's stone | - it is the philosopher's stone | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Diagram== | ||
| + | - scrum is iterative waterfall | ||
| + | - "I'm feeling sort of damp and ..." | ||
| + | - Scrum is the new RUP | ||
| + | - Jeffrey More - 'Crossing the Chasm | ||
| + | - technology adoption lifecycle | ||
| + | - visionaries/early adopters -> early marjority (scrum has crossed over - makes early adopters sad) | ||
Revision as of 20:29, 26 June 2009
Scrum is evil because
- becomes and end in itself - an excuse - "that's not scrum" - treated as a silver bullet - it hides poor estimation - master as dictator - master as project manager - 2 days - certified!
More Evil
- Daily standup = Agile - Agile by the numbers - Dessert first - not worring about technical debt or CI - You lose the baby with the bathwater - scrum teams don't play well with others including customers - it has certification - it is the philosopher's stone
Diagram
- scrum is iterative waterfall - "I'm feeling sort of damp and ..." - Scrum is the new RUP - Jeffrey More - 'Crossing the Chasm - technology adoption lifecycle - visionaries/early adopters -> early marjority (scrum has crossed over - makes early adopters sad)
