Difference between revisions of "CitConNa2007Observations"

From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(cabozel)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
eltacell
 
c4tlatrocri
 
novirelou
 
 
--[[Nick_Naumovich|Nick]] 17:48, 27 April 2007 (PDT) The discussion of topics is ongoing now and I know that I am in the right place.  Not just from the point-of-view of personal acquisition of information, but from the position that the format of the Open Information format is the way to go for conferences of all types.  I have been to hundereds of conferences over my years and this is absolutely refreshing.  We'll see what happens tomorrow, but I know that the discussion between vendors will be fun to observe.
 
--[[Nick_Naumovich|Nick]] 17:48, 27 April 2007 (PDT) The discussion of topics is ongoing now and I know that I am in the right place.  Not just from the point-of-view of personal acquisition of information, but from the position that the format of the Open Information format is the way to go for conferences of all types.  I have been to hundereds of conferences over my years and this is absolutely refreshing.  We'll see what happens tomorrow, but I know that the discussion between vendors will be fun to observe.
  

Latest revision as of 07:54, 25 April 2008

--Nick 17:48, 27 April 2007 (PDT) The discussion of topics is ongoing now and I know that I am in the right place. Not just from the point-of-view of personal acquisition of information, but from the position that the format of the Open Information format is the way to go for conferences of all types. I have been to hundereds of conferences over my years and this is absolutely refreshing. We'll see what happens tomorrow, but I know that the discussion between vendors will be fun to observe.

Love the idea of Open Information format sessions. Let's see what I can get out of this thing. It's promising!

Two of my favorite comments about this format are:

"Law of Two Feet" - Paul

"Conference is like stone soup" - Jeffrey