Difference between revisions of "Is SCRUM Evil?"

From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
 
   - technology adoption lifecycle
 
   - technology adoption lifecycle
 
  - visionaries/early adopters -> early marjority (scrum has crossed over - makes early adopters sad)
 
  - visionaries/early adopters -> early marjority (scrum has crossed over - makes early adopters sad)
 +
 +
==Engineering Envy==
 +
- After the gold rush
 +
- Other engineering professions have bigger budgets, more risk,  more formulae?
 +
- Other engineering professions still have this pain - see the aeronautical engineer who built spaceship One for Richard Branson on lean methodologies
 +
- Delays of Recent Boeing/Airbus Aircraft
 +
- A lot of Agile stuff comes from bottom up - Scrum comes from Top down

Revision as of 20:45, 26 June 2009

Scrum is evil because

- becomes and end in itself - an excuse
- "that's not scrum"
- treated as a silver bullet
- it hides poor estimation
- master as dictator
- master as project manager
- 2 days - certified!

More Evil

- Daily standup = Agile
- Agile by the numbers
- Dessert first - not worring about technical debt or CI
- You lose the baby with the bathwater
- scrum teams don't play well with others including customers
- it has certification
- it is the philosopher's stone

Diagram

- scrum is iterative waterfall
- "I'm feeling sort of damp and ..."
- Scrum is the new RUP
- Jeffrey More - 'Crossing the Chasm
 - technology adoption lifecycle
- visionaries/early adopters -> early marjority (scrum has crossed over - makes early adopters sad)

Engineering Envy

- After the gold rush
- Other engineering professions have bigger budgets, more risk,  more formulae?
- Other engineering professions still have this pain - see the aeronautical engineer who built spaceship One for Richard Branson on lean methodologies
- Delays of Recent Boeing/Airbus Aircraft
- A lot of Agile stuff comes from bottom up - Scrum comes from Top down