Difference between revisions of "CitConNa2007Observations"
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
--[[Nick_Naumovich|Nick]] 17:48, 27 April 2007 (PDT) The discussion of topics is ongoing now and I know that I am in the right place. Not just from the point-of-view of personal acquisition of information, but from the position that the format of the Open Information format is the way to go for conferences of all types. I have been to hundereds of conferences over my years and this is absolutely refreshing. We'll see what happens tomorrow, but I know that the discussion between vendors will be fun to observe. | --[[Nick_Naumovich|Nick]] 17:48, 27 April 2007 (PDT) The discussion of topics is ongoing now and I know that I am in the right place. Not just from the point-of-view of personal acquisition of information, but from the position that the format of the Open Information format is the way to go for conferences of all types. I have been to hundereds of conferences over my years and this is absolutely refreshing. We'll see what happens tomorrow, but I know that the discussion between vendors will be fun to observe. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:54, 25 April 2008
--Nick 17:48, 27 April 2007 (PDT) The discussion of topics is ongoing now and I know that I am in the right place. Not just from the point-of-view of personal acquisition of information, but from the position that the format of the Open Information format is the way to go for conferences of all types. I have been to hundereds of conferences over my years and this is absolutely refreshing. We'll see what happens tomorrow, but I know that the discussion between vendors will be fun to observe.
Love the idea of Open Information format sessions. Let's see what I can get out of this thing. It's promising!
Two of my favorite comments about this format are:
"Law of Two Feet" - Paul
"Conference is like stone soup" - Jeffrey
